<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is what happens when Ads are not relevant to your content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/</link>
	<description>Just Joking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jokerred</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>jokerred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-9</guid>
		<description>@Jeff   Thanks for the wise answer to a stupid question :)  What I just wanted to point out was that the ad is not relevant to the &quot;content&quot;. Underwear is indeed relevant to every human being, but a woman wearing a sexy underwear may not really be relevant to certain people :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff   Thanks for the wise answer to a stupid question <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   What I just wanted to point out was that the ad is not relevant to the &#8220;content&#8221;. Underwear is indeed relevant to every human being, but a woman wearing a sexy underwear may not really be relevant to certain people <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jokerred</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>jokerred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-8</guid>
		<description>@Cristóbal I understand your point. However, just because google cannot target well it doesn&#039;t mean that targeting sucks. What I wanted to point out was that the ad is just not relevant to the content. Maybe relevant in terms of demographics, but not in terms of content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cristóbal I understand your point. However, just because google cannot target well it doesn&#8217;t mean that targeting sucks. What I wanted to point out was that the ad is just not relevant to the content. Maybe relevant in terms of demographics, but not in terms of content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesignNotes by Michael Surtees &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Drop for the Week Ending in Friday the 25th (July 2008)</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>DesignNotes by Michael Surtees &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Drop for the Week Ending in Friday the 25th (July 2008)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] This is what happens when Ads are not relevant to your content [jokerred] EXCERPT: “I came across this while reading Jeff Jarvis’s blog. It doesn’t appear at the top URL, but you can see the displayed ad when you visit any permalink. Notice the top right side of the blog. I was quite surprised to find this image on his blog at first because I thought this was his profile image. Then I saw the captions attached below the picture that said: “Buy Buzzmachine blogads now!”. Oh, it was an ad. But you know, whether it’s an ad or not, it did hurt his image a little at least. I wonder if he’s aware of this. That ad is apparently transmitting a sexual message, and not many people who read his blog should appreciate it.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is what happens when Ads are not relevant to your content [jokerred] EXCERPT: “I came across this while reading Jeff Jarvis’s blog. It doesn’t appear at the top URL, but you can see the displayed ad when you visit any permalink. Notice the top right side of the blog. I was quite surprised to find this image on his blog at first because I thought this was his profile image. Then I saw the captions attached below the picture that said: “Buy Buzzmachine blogads now!”. Oh, it was an ad. But you know, whether it’s an ad or not, it did hurt his image a little at least. I wonder if he’s aware of this. That ad is apparently transmitting a sexual message, and not many people who read his blog should appreciate it.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristóbal Palmer</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristóbal Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at blogads.com? All their ads have to be approved by the bloggers. Jeff at least tacitly approves of every single blogads ad that runs on his site. Whether the blogads ads are relevant to the content is totally up to Jeff.

Furthermore, have you never seen the atrocities that google puts up that are supposedly &quot;relevant&quot; to the content? I&#039;ve seen blogs that spend five paragraphs trashing McCain and some public gaffe only to have google ads for McCain t-shirts at the bottom. Idiocy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at blogads.com? All their ads have to be approved by the bloggers. Jeff at least tacitly approves of every single blogads ad that runs on his site. Whether the blogads ads are relevant to the content is totally up to Jeff.</p>
<p>Furthermore, have you never seen the atrocities that google puts up that are supposedly &#8220;relevant&#8221; to the content? I&#8217;ve seen blogs that spend five paragraphs trashing McCain and some public gaffe only to have google ads for McCain t-shirts at the bottom. Idiocy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Madej presents: Digital Marketing Rucksack</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Madej presents: Digital Marketing Rucksack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;When targeted web ads aren&#039;t as good as untargeted ones...&lt;/strong&gt;

...I&#039;m sure most people reading his blog use this product known as &quot;underwear&quot; on a regular basis. But I also understand what the reader is getting at -- why an underwear ad on a business blog?......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When targeted web ads aren&#8217;t as good as untargeted ones&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;I&#8217;m sure most people reading his blog use this product known as &#8220;underwear&#8221; on a regular basis. But I also understand what the reader is getting at &#8212; why an underwear ad on a business blog?&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Under it all</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Under it all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] over to the right right now that I think I might pay the advertiser to keep it. A reader complained that it is irrelevant advertising but I say: Isn&#8217;t underwear relevant to us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over to the right right now that I think I might pay the advertiser to keep it. A reader complained that it is irrelevant advertising but I say: Isn&#8217;t underwear relevant to us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/this-is-what-happens-when-ads-are-not-relevant-to-your-content/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Underwear is pretty much relevant to everyone, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underwear is pretty much relevant to everyone, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
